10 Years After

My return to college

9.20.2002

Surfin' Dead
Wednesday in Spanish the class watched a National Geographic movie about Mexico. That'd be great except we have a test on Monday and I feel like I wasted time that could have been more constructively used. I'm sure that there are students in the class glad that lame movies are watched, classes are cancelled, etc. However, I'm in the class to learn the language so that I can take three more semesters in order to graduate. So frustrating. At least we are scheduled to do a review for the test today.

In British Literature I turned in my essay on Wordsworth's philosphy of Nature. It was to be a four page paper, but turned out to be 6. I had a lot of information to discuss so hopefully its organization is lucid. In class we completed out discussion of Christabel and then rushed through the remaining few STC poems. While reading Christabel I picked up on the references to Geraldine being a vampire, as well as the images comparing her to a snake. However, I hadn't heard of a Lamia and didn't recognize her from Greek mythology. The instructor told us that these were mythological creatures that were half-human and half-snake. Ah, I remembered such creatures from my AD&D day, only they were called Naga. So, I thought I would put something down here after I did a few quick searches. Below is a compsite of stuff about Naga, Vampires, and Lamia : -

Naga is one of a handful of rare words surviving the loss of the first universal language. The word Naga is rooted in Sanskrit and means "Serpent". In the East Indian pantheon it is connected with the Serpent Spirit and the Dragon Spirit. It has an quivalency to the Burmese Nats, or god-serpents. In the Esoteric Tradition it is synonymous for Adepts, or Initiates. In India and Egypt, and even in Central and South America, the Naga stands for one who is wise. In Buddhism, wisdom has always been tied, symbollically, to the figure of the Serpent. In the Western Tradition it can be found as used by the Christ in the Gospel of Saint Matthew (x.16), "Be ye therefore as serpents, and harmless as doves."

Nobody knows when the first vampiric figures were conceived, but they date back at least 4,000 years, to the ancient Assyrians and Babylonians of Mesopotamia. Mesopotamians feared Lamastu (also spelled Lamashtu), a vicious demon goddess who preyed on humans. In Assyrian legend, Lamastu, the daughter of sky god Anu, would creep into a house at night and steal or kill babies, either in their cribs or in the womb (sudden infant death syndrome and miscarriage were generally attributed to this figure).

Lamastu, which translates to "she who erases," would also prey on adults, bringing disease, sterility and nightmares and sucking the blood from young men. She is often depicted with wings and birdlike talons, and sometimes with the head of a lion. To protect themselves from Lamastu, pregnant women would wear amulets depicting Pazuzu, another evil god who once defeated the demoness.

The ancient Greeks believed in the strigoe or lamiae, who were monsters who ate children and drank their blood. In one version of the legend, Lamia was one of Zeus' mortal lovers. Filled with anger and jealousy, Zeus' wife, the goddess Hera, made Lamia insane so she would eat all her children. Once Lamia realized what she had done, she became so angry that she turned into an immortal monster, a demoness with the head and torso of a woman and the lower body of a snake, sucking the blood from young children out of jealousy for their mothers.

A tale known by both the Greeks and Romans, for example, concerns the wedding of a young man named Menippus. At the wedding a guest, who was a noted philosopher called Apollonius of Tyana, carefully observed the bride, who was said to be beautiful. Apollonius finally accused the wife of being a vampire, and according to the story (as it was later told by a scholar named Philostratus in the first century A.D.) the wife confessed to vampirism. Allegedly she was planning to marry Menippus merely to have him handy as a source of fresh blood to drink.

9.18.2002

Bird-en
The worst feeling for me is being late for class. I hated it 10 years ago when I was first in college and I hate it now. The difference is that 10 years ago I would simply not enter the class if I was late and this morning I tromped to the front of class to take my seat. I would have take one in the back, but they were all taken.
We finished discussing STC's Rime of the Ancient Mariner, which we started last class, and started Christabel. After all was said and done about Rime of the Ancient Mariner one kid in the class raises his hand and asked if all the problems started when the bird was killed. What? How could he not have grasped that idea despite it being clear in the text and the professor stating and restating it multiple times. Heck, he even discussed several thematic aspects of the poem, all of which centered around the killing of the bird. Very strange.

( \Al"ba*tross\, n. [Corrupt. fr. Pg. alcatraz cormorant, albatross, or Sp. alcatraz a pelican: cf. Pg. alcatruz, Sp. arcaduz, a bucket, fr. Ar. al-q[=a]dus the bucket, fr. Gr. ka`dos, a water vessel. So an Arabic term for pelican is water-carrier, as a bird carrying water in its pouch.] (Zo["o]l.) A web-footed bird, of the genus Diomedea, of which there are several species. They are the largest of sea birds, capable of long-continued flight, and are often seen at great distances from the land. They are found chiefly in the southern hemisphere.
Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary... )

See also my other blog's post about Pelicans and Albatross.

9.17.2002

This old Atlantic Monthly article looks interesting. Also, this page offers some resources for understanding Coleridge's Rime of the Ancient Mariner. Part of my test in British Literature next Monday will be to offer an interpretation.

Launch the Polaris, the end doesn't scare us
or, a war with no end.

At one point in American Government, while speaking about "public interest", the instructor asked the class if the United States was threatened by Iraq. At first there was silence and then someone offered up that yes the US was threatened by Iraq because Iraq could raise the oil prices here. This student's answer brought forth a small chorus of people who agreed that Iraq was a threat. The Conservative student in the class at first seemed to disagree with these students. He stated that it wasn't believed that Iraq had a missile capable of delivering a nuclear payload from Iraq to the U.S. However, he then added that Iraq could bring it to the US via shipping cargo to one of our ports or enter it through the Canadian boarder. A student sitting next to me claimed that Saddam Hussein could sell the weapons of mass destruction to terrorists.

When the class was asked what the purpose of developing nuclear weapons was the original student to answer stated it was defensive. The instructor asked if Iraq poses more of a threat than Russia did during the cold war. The student next to me that had expressed a concern that Hussein would sell weapons stated that the Soviets were more stable.

This all strikes me as odd. I mean, if we fear Iraq because they could raise oil prices what about the other Opec countries? What about Russia currently? Not for threats of nuclear attack but for raising oild prices?

While there have been concerns reported in the media about Iraq giving their (as yet undeveloped) nuclear weapons to terrorists this seems highly odd. If the US is able to ascertain that Iraq is attempting to buy the equipment to build nuclear weapons wouldn't we also be able to determine they were trying to seel, or give away, such a weapon. Wouldn't a concern for the United State's ability to determine this, in itself, prevent Saddam Hussein from attempting to part with such weapons in the future for fear of it provoking an attack?

Also, why would he give away weapons he sought so long to build? Why didn't he just give the funds or resources to Afghanistan, for them to build the weapons, if he merely wanted to give nuclear weapons to Al Queda,? To say that Hussein is a criminal is well and god, but that doens't mean he would collude with other criminals does it? Just because a person is a bank robber doesn't mean that he merely doens't want banks to have money. No, of course not. He wants the money for himself.

I just throw my hands up in the air and seek out what Pat Buchanan has to say. Pat Buchanan? Why not, some of my views seem to be very similiar to his own about all this talk about weapons of mass desctruction.

9.16.2002

Slept in but not overslept.
Over the weekend I came close to completing my essay on nature in Wordsworth poetry. I still need to cover a few poems and flesh out the paragraph(s) about "The Thorn" and "Resolution and Independence." I also watched "Spy Kids 2." Why? Well, in my Spanish class we need three cultural credits. This movie, directed by Robert Rodriguez, is suppose to be of cultural note. Rodriguez's El Mariachi would have been better.

As a side note, I was reading through the John Purkis' "Wordsworth" before class began and came across a neat tidbit. The passage about nature was referring to how Wordsworth 'inherits from Locke an intense concern with the visible universe..." Purkis goes on to say "The terminology of Locke is still considered valid to support the argument advanced in the Preface to Lyrical Ballads: we are referred to 'sensations' and 'ideas', and told that 'falsehood of description' has been avoided, for the object of poetry is 'truth'. In this way, Wordsworth insists, 'Poetry is the most philosophic of all writing.' One of the passages used to show this is from "The Thorn":

And to the left, three yards beyond,
You see a little muddy pond
Of water, never dry;
I've measured it from side to side;
'Tis three feet long, and two feet wide...."


The idea of visible universe struck me as something that Wordsworth had talked about some. After all it was in the prelude where he talks about his stay at Cambridge that he describes how from his bedroom above the college kitchens he could view the statue of Newton holding the prism. Even the Norton Anthology text comments that the prism was used by Newton in his study of optics.

Archives

09.01.2002   09.08.2002   09.15.2002   09.22.2002   09.29.2002   10.06.2002   10.13.2002   10.20.2002   10.27.2002   11.03.2002   11.10.2002   11.17.2002   12.08.2002   01.05.2003   01.12.2003   01.19.2003   01.26.2003   02.02.2003   02.23.2003   05.04.2003   08.10.2003   08.24.2003   08.31.2003   09.07.2003   09.14.2003   09.21.2003   09.28.2003   10.05.2003   10.12.2003   10.19.2003   10.26.2003   11.02.2003   11.09.2003   12.21.2003   01.04.2004   01.11.2004   03.14.2004   03.21.2004   03.28.2004   04.04.2004   04.11.2004   04.18.2004   04.25.2004   05.09.2004   12.05.2004   12.26.2004   02.06.2005   03.06.2005   03.20.2005   04.03.2005   04.24.2005   05.01.2005   05.08.2005   05.29.2005   06.12.2005   06.19.2005   07.10.2005   07.24.2005  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?